Avoid like the plague - Mitarbeiter (anonym) bei EditorLive: Mitarbeiterbewertung

1.0
27. Mai 2015
Freelancer (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Plenty of low-paying work for the taking Meager paychecks do come regularly You won't get to set your own hours, but occasionally you can ask to be taken off your shift

Kontras

-Extremely low pay (sometimes below minimum wage) after hours required are totaled -No benefits of any kind -Abusive and dishonest employment practices (classify employees as contractors while making employer-type demands) -Company owner has no idea what editing is or what editors do, resulting in outrageous demands being made of editors -In a nutshell, this is a digital sweatshop AVOID!

Mehr Bewertungen zu EditorLive entdecken

5.0
24. März 2021
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Working from home Interesting articles to edit Easy-to-use interface to grab jobs (basically, you clock in on a website and then grab jobs to edit from a queue on the company's website) Supportive management and fun coworkers Easy to track your daily word count and commission If you can get on a shift that works for you, then you will likely have time to earn income from a second gig or freelance work.

Kontras

Some jobs, by their nature, are boring. For me, papers on algorithms, organizational management, education/teacher training, and nursing are very boring. Some of our clients produce heavy ESL writing, which combined with a boring paper topic, can be a grind. Like any distribution, the documents tend to cluster around average difficulty, so it's not too bad.

1.0
7. Aug. 2013
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Editors work from home, communicating with management through IM and Skype. Paychecks don't bounce. Company's servers are generally always up.

Kontras

Salary and incentive structure is completely flat. No raises, no bonuses, no increased commission -- EVER. Loyalty to employees is completely absent. At least half of all editors were recently laid off (July 2013) with no warning -- and were notified by a ONE SENTENCE, poorly-worded EMAIL. Decisions are made arbitrarily and policies are instituted without proper consideration (and are often later revoked). Commission structure (40%) is low. Editors are treated like children -- instructed not to communicate with other editors and given as little information about their jobs as possible. A ratings system was recently established, but with no method of correcting errors in the ratings. Even after a client notified the company that he or she meant to give an editor five stars, but mistakenly believed that one star was the highest rating, the one star rating was allowed to stand and the editor's overall ranking was negatively affected. Senior editors are allowed to retaliate against rank and file editors whom they do not like, by withholding the highest paying assignments. Horrible company.

7
Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle