Great company to work for! - SAT Rater bei ETS: Mitarbeiterbewertung

4.0
28. März 2017
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

- Decent pay rate (per hour) - Work from home - Decent amount of hours per month when essay volume is at its highest - Great for people who enjoy using their attention to detail and intelligence at work - Flexible hours and scheduling

Kontras

- Scoring leaders' interpretations of essays varies (you get a different scoring leader each day) which can make day-to-day scoring tricky sometimes. I have had some scoring leaders give me information on how to properly score that has been proven by the company's training and advice to be incorrect... - While working with scoring leaders is usually a positive experience, some scoring leaders are not diplomatic and assume they are right about everything just because of the position they hold. This can lead to some patronization on the job... - With the nature of the job comes an unpredictable amount of hours per week/month; so you cannot depend on this job to be a primary source of income and can, at most, depend on it to be a solid 2nd source of income.

Mehr Bewertungen zu ETS entdecken

5.0
11. Apr. 2025
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

It was a good experience.

Kontras

Nothing of note that was negative.

1.0
22. Mai 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Support of immediate management and coworkers makes coming to work every day a pleasure.

Kontras

Where to start... First, the employee performance evaluation process and methodology has changed from 1) performance vs your job description to 2) OKRs which were completely unattainable and meaningless at every level to 3) rocks and outcomes which again have very little to do with the day to day jobs of most employees. It seems the burden for goals and objectives and performance management has shifted from management to employees as they try to define a methodology that holds only doers responsible for the company's success. All this since Amit Sevak took over. Management manipulated the questions in a recent employee survey to force responses that made it look like there was improvement year over year. Of course, when you add a new President between the employees and the CEO peoples opinion of senior management is improved. Of course when you shift the focus to immediate management from senior management, the responses will be improved. Try issuing the exact same survey as the prior year and see how much "real" improvement there was in the numbers.

1
Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle