here's my take on Dow. - Technical Service and Development Engineer bei Dow: Mitarbeiterbewertung

2.0
16. Okt. 2008
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Dow Chemical is a large company with significant corporate overhead and procedures in place. Dow is great for training programs, safety and health training and process control. This is a great company to begin a career and train. Dow is very active in promoting diversity and inclusion. Corporate headquarters are in Midland, MI, the location of a chemical plant so management is not isolated from any issues at the plant.

Kontras

Dow is trying to turn itself into a specialty company and management believes it is on the right track with the purchase of Rohm and Haas. However, middle and lower management has not bought into this approach and with so few managers nowdays, a single manager has wide latitude when making decisions. Dow has many employees who have spent their whole career at Dow and many of these employees are just hanging around to get their retirement and medical benefits. Dow is pushing diversity and inclusion and white males are often overlooked for promotional opportunities.

Mehr Bewertungen zu Dow entdecken

5.0
16. Apr. 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Culture and the technical expertise within the company provide for a working environment where you don't work in silo and everyone is willing to help support you

Kontras

Administrative systems can be burdensome to overcome.

2.0
22. März 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Safety culture, flexibility (although less and less over time). Good health insurance and 401k match

Kontras

Dow’s recent years illustrate the challenges of trying to simultaneously satisfy Wall Street’s demands for strong financial performance and aggressive DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) priorities. The company has heavily emphasized inclusion initiatives, including its openly gay CEO publicly sharing that coming out was one of the best days of his life in an internal communication, along with a notable increase in women appointed to senior leadership roles. Hiring practices reportedly require diverse candidate slates—including female candidates—and diverse interview panels before filling positions. These efforts, while well-intentioned, appear to have contributed to a series of questionable strategic decisions. Employees have borne the brunt through repeated rounds of layoffs (including significant cuts announced in recent years), minimal merit increases often in the 2-3% range, stalled promotions, and little turnover at the top levels of leadership. Senior executives seem insulated from the consequences, potentially overlooking how these factors—including their own leadership—may be central to the company’s ongoing struggles.

1
Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle