review - Project Management Office (PMO) bei Danone: Mitarbeiterbewertung

4.0
12. März 2025
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Pays above the market, though this may not be the case for new employees. The company has a strong brand, which is beneficial for career growth. It positions itself as people-centric, promoting good people management practices and providing reasonable job security; however, in some cases, this may be more of an external image than an internal reality. The company offers real opportunities for career development, both vertically and horizontally, including international career prospects.

Kontras

The company has been undergoing continuous transformations for over 10 years, aiming to catch up with market leaders and achieve specific financial targets. This creates an overwhelming workload, as employees must balance day-to-day responsibilities while constantly being involved in transformation initiatives. Additionally, these ongoing changes lead to frequent redundancies, fostering a competitive, sometimes toxic, and highly political work environment.

Mehr Bewertungen zu Danone entdecken

5.0
30. Apr. 2026
Praktikant (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Great people, highly structured, unique learning opportunities

Kontras

Team was fully remote so sometimes a bit difficult to communicate with everyone

1.0
3. Feb. 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Work-life balance exists and is generally respected. Bonuses can be good, depending on the year and leadership priorities. Strong, reputable brands that look impressive on a résumé. "Some" genuinely great people who work hard despite the environment.

Kontras

No meritocracy whatsoever. Promotions and career growth are driven by favoritism, internal alliances, and visibility politics rather than performance or results. Advancement often feels like a popularity contest. “Core values” are largely performative. They are referenced often but ignored when inconvenient, especially at leadership levels. Questionable long-term strategy. Direction changes frequently, priorities shift without explanation, and long-term planning feels weak or reactive. Extremely bureaucratic. Simple decisions require excessive approvals, slowing execution and stifling innovation. Politics over performance. Success depends more on who you align with than what you deliver. If you're not "one of them" or if they don't want to continue paying you your value, they'll find ways to get rid of you. So choose wisely and research the role and team.

5
Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle