Coordinate - Mitarbeiter (anonym) bei Crowley: Mitarbeiterbewertung

4.0
1. März 2021
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Good game and good graphics

Kontras

Badger park and the river west

Mehr Bewertungen zu Crowley entdecken

5.0
13. Jan. 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Great place to work. Highly recommend.

Kontras

Nothing worth mentioning really. I've been doing this quite some time and this is truly a group of people to work with.

avatar
Reaktion von Crowley
3mo
Thank you for taking the time to share your experience. We’re glad to hear Crowley has been a meaningful place to grow over the years. It's great to know the team and environment have made a positive impact. We appreciate your perspective and remain committed to fostering a workplace where people feel supported and proud of their work.
1.0
27. März 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Flexible work schedules (hybrid) and new opportunities for some

Kontras

My experience with Crowley Maritime Corporation highlights systemic leadership and cultural challenges that significantly impact organizational effectiveness and employee well-being. At a high level, there appears to be a persistent gap in leadership accountability, where individuals in leadership roles who do not demonstrate effective management, communication, or team development capabilities are not addressed or replaced. This lack of corrective action allows ineffective leadership practices to persist, ultimately influencing team performance, morale, and overall operational outcomes. From an organizational culture standpoint, the work environment reflects characteristics commonly associated with toxicity, including limited collaboration, diminished trust, and a lack of psychological safety. There is a noticeable absence of respect in day-to-day interactions, with insufficient emphasis on professional conduct, inclusivity, and mutual support. This environment not only affects employee engagement but also undermines the foundational elements required for high-performing teams. A particularly concerning aspect is the organization’s handling of workforce reductions. During layoffs, there appeared to be minimal effort to explore alternative solutions such as internal redeployment or reassignment of impacted employees to other roles within the organization. This reflects a lack of strategic workforce planning and, more critically, a lack of empathy in decision-making processes that directly affect employees’ livelihoods. The absence of transparent communication and compassionate leadership during these periods further contributed to a perception that employee well-being was not a priority.

Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle