Looking for a place to grow, and learn from people who excel at what they do? This isn't it. - Mitarbeiter (anonym) bei Complex: Mitarbeiterbewertung

2.0
29. März 2017
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

The culture is laid back and free. They have fun events you can get exposure from. There are a handful of people who are brilliant and talented. Free fruit on certain days, beer on tap and free espresso machines.

Kontras

No clear directions. Best case scenario, goals are unrealistic in proportion to their investment in their staff. Worst case is no goals at all. Some people who have been there too long and are at managerial levels are simply petulant and unqualified. They are bitter, miserable and are the root of a lot of negativity. Take the Human part of HR and they may come close to expectations. This company also seems to be trending towards a "too many Chiefs, not enough Indians" scenario, there is no shortage of VPs. It is very much a boys' club, with a couple of women thrown in for good measure. Sheer talent and hard work ain't gonna get you into that club.

Mehr Bewertungen zu Complex entdecken

5.0
8. Juni 2026
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Culture was exceptional and the company was filled with intelligent people

Kontras

There were not many cons

1.0
17. Mai 2026
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Complex had genuine brand equity and talented people throughout the organization. That makes it all the more frustrating to watch the company be run the way it is.

Kontras

Executive leadership operates on ego, tenure, and proximity to power rather than performance or accountability. There is no coherent business strategy, and more tellingly, no apparent interest in developing one. Decision-making is opinion-based at the top and the consequences flow downward. Appointments are made based on relationships rather than qualifications, including in roles that require deep technical expertise. Asking seasoned professionals to report into leadership with no relevant background isn't just a structural mistake, it's demoralizing to people who have spent careers building real expertise. Compensation and growth are effectively frozen. Annual reviews were canceled under the guise of budget constraints, which reflects a fundamental misunderstanding of what reviews are for. Performance conversations, goal-setting, and professional development are not line items; canceling them signals that the company has given up on investing in its people. The RTO policy is the clearest window into how leadership thinks about its workforce. The mandate exists with no meaningful connection to productivity, output, or business outcomes. The stated rationale, making the office look occupied, is not a strategy. Exceptions are applied inconsistently and without explanation. The net effect is a policy that reads as punitive toward exactly the kind of senior, expert, autonomous professionals a media-tech company should be fighting to retain. Layoffs have been handled with a level of callousness that is hard to overstate. The manner in which people have been let go reflects a broader indifference to the humans behind the headcount. If you are a high performer who values transparency, strategic clarity, and being treated like a professional adult, look carefully before accepting an offer here.

4
Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle