the worst company you could work in - Senior Software Engineer bei Bit68: Mitarbeiterbewertung

Tech team ownership Tech team dynamics Team was very flexible to structure/process changes and adapted quickly

- Leadership and management style were heavily centralized around the CEO, leaving little room for autonomy or meaningful contribution from technical leadership. - Decision-making was inconsistent and frequently changed based on short-term reactions rather than clear strategy or planning. - Engineering quality, maintainability, and proper technical practices were repeatedly sacrificed in favor of extremely aggressive delivery timelines and rapid client acquisition. - Lack of transparency regarding company direction, financial decisions, and internal changes created uncertainty across the team. - Salaries were below market level compared to responsibilities and expectations. - Annual raises were communicated and expected by the team for months, but were never implemented before layoffs began. - There was a recurring pattern of undermining the engineering team’s value instead of investing in improving processes and team stability. - Team leads had very limited authority and were mostly expected to execute top-down decisions without real influence on technical or organizational direction.

The team and everyone working there are cooperative and help each other.

The management is extremely poor. Salary below average. The management tends to hire anyone who graduated from the German University in Cairo (GUC) as a project manager simply because they are GUC graduates. There is no proper organization or real focus on work quality — the only thing that matters is finishing tasks quickly just to satisfy the client. The company also tries to present a completely different image on social media that does not reflect the actual work environment or internal reality. Another major issue is that management is not transparent or clear with employees. For example, employees were promised annual salary increases in January and February, but the raises were never implemented, and management never communicated any updates or clarification afterward.