RAs: Enjoy your mental health? The Biohub is not for you - Research Associate bei Biohub: Mitarbeiterbewertung

1.0
21. Jan. 2021
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

amazing science, beautiful building and state of the art labs

Kontras

some of this is very team dependent, so take my review with a grain of salt. that being said, my conversations with other RAs have illustrated that burnout is rampant. expect to be treated as an experienced graduate student, without the proper mentorship or financial compensation. i think the main issue comes down to having young team leaders that have no actual management skills, so you end up with an over-achieving boss who does not know the value of positive feedback and is mostly trying to use you for your skills/time/youthful energy so that they can publish papers and make their bosses happy. perhaps if we got paid more than ~60k it might be worth it!

Mehr Bewertungen zu Biohub entdecken

5.0
10. März 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Amazing work environment. Very supportive coworkers and mentors

Kontras

No cons I can think of

1.0
19. Feb. 2026
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

There are talented, mission-driven people here, but the organization is currently defined by instability and short-term decision-making.

Kontras

Strategic direction changes frequently, often with little notice, which creates constant whiplash for teams. Projects are started, stopped, and re-scoped on timelines that make it difficult to execute thoughtfully. Long-term planning feels limited, and it’s hard to see a consistent vision guiding decisions and work really is defined by whatever dream the people in leadership had the night before or what the headline was of yesterday. Morale is the lowest I’ve ever seen. Many employees are actively exploring other opportunities, and there is widespread frustration about the lack of transparency and follow-through from leadership. Concerns are raised repeatedly, but meaningful changes rarely materialize. There is also a disconnect between the stated mission and the work being done. Support for external scientists and end users does not always appear to be prioritized in practice, despite being central to the organization’s public messaging. If you’re interviewing, ask direct questions about: Turnover on the team you’re joining How often priorities have shifted in the past year What concrete steps leadership has taken to address morale How strategy is set and communicated The mission is compelling, but candidates should carefully evaluate whether the current environment aligns with what they’re looking for.

Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle