Not my dream job. - Mitarbeiter (anonym) bei Atrium Health: Mitarbeiterbewertung

2.0
7. Juni 2015
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Once you're in the system, it's pretty easy to move around. HR is helpful with getting you where you need to be while making sure you don't have any issues with your former boss or office.

Kontras

During my last 4 years of working with the system, I've held 3 different positions. Only one of my managers were truly genuine and seemed to care about her employees. I ran into way too many situations where you would get in trouble for little things because "it's policy and I have to." Once of my managers knew I was going through tough season and would periodically ask me how I was doing, so of course I would fill her in on a few things and just keep her generally updated. Little did I know she counted all of those chats as "counseling" and once you have a certain number of "counseling" marks in your file, you get a verbal warning, then a write up, and so on. Over all I'm not impressed and would love to get myself out once I have enough experience to move on.

Mehr Bewertungen zu Atrium Health entdecken

5.0
13. Feb. 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Great training and culture. There is continuing education throughout the year.

Kontras

I had no cons for this job. I loved working here.

2.0
21. Juni 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

I spent many years in outpatient rehabilitation and saw firsthand how much meaningful patient care can happen when clinicians are empowered. Earlier in my tenure, there were real opportunities for growth, mentorship and professional development. The team was collaborative and deeply committed to patients, and support staff worked hard under challenging circumstances. Those are strengths worth acknowledging.

Kontras

As leadership changed, the culture around performance and advancement shifted. Over time I felt that institutional memory, specialty expertise and long‑term contributions were not valued consistently. Promotion practices seemed opaque, and I saw clinicians with substantially less experience and questionable communication acumen move into roles without clear explanations. Most importantly, I experienced increasing friction between high performers and leaders whose roles felt more performative than grounded in clinical or operational expertise. That tension appeared to be tolerated by the institution. Questions about decisions were discouraged, and requests for discussion went unanswered—even when they came from people with decades of service and a record of strong outcomes. After years of above‑average performance reviews, the feedback I received near the end of my tenure seemed inconsistent with my record and, in my view, hypocritical. This sudden shift in narrative felt like a mechanism to justify decisions already made rather than an honest assessment. For clinicians who invest deeply in their programs and relationships, contradictory or last‑minute feedback is demoralizing and undermines trust in the review process. Although department leaders appear to view themselves as emotionally intelligent, my experience was quite different: they delivered polished, stoic performances but did not exhibit the empathy, listening, or unbiased 360 assessment skills that clinicians need from leadership. That disconnect was another source of friction between high performers and management.

1
Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle