Little investment in talent - DC office - Mitarbeiter (anonym) bei Associated Press: Mitarbeiterbewertung

3.0
13. Nov. 2014
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Get to work with very smart people, little nonsense and the feeling of working on very important and serious issues in the heart of DC -- politics, elections, Supreme Court, etc. Protection under the Guild, OT pay and getting your stories in front of millions of eyes across the globe is tough to beat. Great camaraderie with co-workers.

Kontras

Flexibility depends on the editor. Do not expect a raise unless you hold the management hostage with the possibility of another job elsewhere, and even then, don't expect them to see you as an investment, no matter how long you have been there. Much of management think they are better than non-management. And there is little cultivation of career advancement except for those in the inner-circle.

Mehr Bewertungen zu Associated Press entdecken

5.0
6. Mai 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Work was easy and supervisors were helpful

Kontras

It can get very busy during peak times.

1.0
21. Dez. 2025
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

You get to work with lovely people, some of which are brilliant.

Kontras

This is an organization where relationships often matter more than results. Advancement tends to favor visibility and proximity over impact, which can make the path forward feel less about contribution and more about navigation. HR and People functions appear heavily resourced on paper, yet those teams are frequently stretched thin, creating the impression of care without the corresponding capacity to deliver it meaningfully. Each year brings another cycle of organizational reshuffling that can feel at odds with the stated focus on employee experience and development. Learning and development exists, but its purpose is sometimes unclear, as day-to-day work life has grown more complicated rather than more supported compared to prior years. There is a noticeable gap between the language used around innovation and data driven decision making and the organization’s appetite for actual change. The culture often speaks in aspirational terms while operating in familiar patterns. For employees who value transparency, consistency, and progress over rhetoric, this can be frustrating. The result is a workplace that talks about transformation but remains largely committed to the status quo.

1
Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle