Tech startup experience with a positive twist. - Technical Project Manager bei Array (NY): Mitarbeiterbewertung

5.0
4. Feb. 2023
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Wanted to wait until I'd been here for 90+ days to review. As it turns out, what you see is what you get - and I mean that in a great way. My interview process had a few light bumps, but in general the Talent team was extremely communicative, and all of my interviewers were transparent about the job role, culture, leadership team, executives, etc (something you can only confirm after joining, of course). For a startup at this stage, I'm honestly floored with how much thought and care they've put into the personnel infrastructure. Feels like a 5-10y strong company from an organizational resources standpoint. Dedicated & talented People org, diversity & inclusion org well in advance of federal requirements, fairly well established reporting structure. There are even purposeful efforts underway to ensure career advancement is clear and available, which is (again) rare for a startup. Even long-established companies struggle with this. Your job description is your job description. That may seem silly to add explicitly, but at startups you can get hired to do one thing and a month later you find yourself doing 3 jobs. There absolutely will be times when you have to flex skillsets to cover PTO or a job vacancy, but it isn't the norm. I'm going to run out of characters to use for this review but I'll tie it up by saying the pros far outweigh the minor cons. The products we're working on are cool, the people & ELT are great, and company outlook is positive. Above all I enjoy my job & the people I work with more than I have at any previous workplace.

Kontras

Startups have some startup problems. Array has done a great job addressing many of them, but it wouldn't be fair to say there aren't any. That said, take these with a grain of salt: if you're applying at a tech startup, you should be prepared for them already. Turnover at the mangement+ level is moderate, although within expectations for a tech startup I think. Turnover is high everywhere in tech, too. Reorgs happen frequently. This is just a most-tech-companies thing, doubly true for startups. You have to be able to pivot to new teams/squads/reporting structures with grace and agility to keep up. Highest level executives still have a hand in day-to-day operations. It can be intimidating if you're not used to it, and happens naturally while companies accelerate hiring during a growth phase. Eventually it will change, but worth noting that some executive interaction skills will help.

Mehr Bewertungen zu Array (NY) entdecken

5.0
1. Mai 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Clear expectations at a very stable organization.

Kontras

High expectations can lead to friction in some cases

1.0
6. Apr. 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Got paid for interview and onboarding

Kontras

I went through what felt like a “ghost job” type of process. I was given a two-day technical assessment that required very little sleep and included pulling an all-nighter. The assignment was highly realistic and closely resembled production-level work in both scope and expectations. A significant amount of time and effort was required before even having a clearly established or confirmed role. This also included a CCAT assessment as part of the screening process, along with employment verification, ~45 pages of documents, and several hours of video content. After that, I was asked to record two 5–10 minute videos based on those materials, with very minimal prompts and no clear grading criteria or expectations. I was then told I scored just slightly below “acceptable” and was terminated immediately. The entire process felt disorganized from start to finish. The technical assessment was missing key pieces, almost as if it was incomplete or still being tested. During onboarding, I was already being added to meetings and even assigned a task, despite not having fully completed the onboarding process. Part of the reasoning given for my termination was that I wasn’t proactive in pointing out that I had been added to meetings and should have been focusing on onboarding instead. This was especially confusing, as those meetings and tasks were initiated by the team themselves. Given the amount of upfront work required and how the process was structured, this raised serious concerns for me about whether the role was clearly defined or fully established, and whether the expectations for candidates were aligned with an actual longterm position. Advice to others: Be cautious about the time commitment required before the role is fully secured. The process may require substantial effort upfront without clear expectations or evaluation criteria.

9
Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle