Very excited to be here - Senior Manager, Product Management bei Amazon Web Services: Mitarbeiterbewertung

4.0
19. Juli 2022
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

I joined a month ago and have loved it so far. I am part of a new team that is just getting built out. - Everybody has been very helpful, and the team has a strong vision for the product we are building. - I am surrounded by the smartest of people. Every day is a growing experience, and there is no room for stagnation - Great technlogies to learn. - Onboarding process has been great, with immersion into the Amazon leadership principles, and all the peculiar things that make Amazon who they are. - Comp package is pretty competitive.

Kontras

The work culture is targeted towards self-motivated and self-driven employees. Amazon hires smart people who can make a difference and who can make smart choices. This is not really a con if you are someone who thrives in such an environment but if you are someone who needs explicit directions from your management, this place might not be for you. There is literally an unlimited list of opportunities and things to work on, and how your time can be spent. You need to make the right choices on how you spend your time. Again this is not a con if you like such an environment, but if you are someone who needs very clear directions and does not like ambiguity, this can be a turnoff.

Mehr Bewertungen zu Amazon Web Services entdecken

5.0
27. Mai 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Great job. I’ve learned so much it is just hard with 5 day rto

Kontras

The 5 day RTO mandate

4.0
12. Mai 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Operated in systems that had real scale, operational constraints, and production consequences.

Kontras

Working at Amazon Web Services gave me strong exposure to distributed systems, operational ownership, and production-scale infrastructure, but there were definitely tradeoffs as well. One downside was that, like many large organizations, ownership could become fragmented. You often own a subsystem or workflow rather than an entire product end-to-end, which can limit exposure to broader architectural decision-making unless you deliberately seek it out. There was also significant process overhead. Design reviews, operational processes, dependency coordination, and organizational alignment were valuable for learning rigor, but they can slow iteration compared to smaller engineering teams. Another challenge is that large internal ecosystems can abstract away infrastructure complexity. AWS has extensive internal tooling, deployment systems, and operational platforms, which are powerful, but some of that experience does not transfer directly outside the company. I also found that operational work could dominate engineering time at points. Handling production issues, retries, integration failures, and on-call responsibilities teaches reliability engineering well, but it can reduce the amount of time spent on deeper technical exploration or greenfield development. Finally, there is the perception aspect. AWS is a strong name, but experienced interviewers know there is wide variance between teams and roles. The company name opens doors, but ultimately you still need to demonstrate technical depth, ownership, and strong engineering judgment independently of the brand.

Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle