Excellent mission but ... - Mitarbeiter (anonym) bei Advancement Project: Mitarbeiterbewertung

2.0
13. Aug. 2015
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Excellent mission. Freedom to talk openly about race. Energetic staff. Passionate leadership. Interesting programs. Good location. Real commitment to social justice. Community lawyering.

Kontras

Far too heavy a work load. No down time. Not enough staff to do the work that needs to be done. Pay is low compared to similar civil rights and advocacy organizations. Poor work-life balance.

Mehr Bewertungen zu Advancement Project entdecken

5.0
2. Aug. 2022
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

- supportive team culture - progressive responsibilities, exposure to diverse stakeholders - high-impact projects

Kontras

- unpaid internships in this day and age?

3.0
13. Dez. 2021
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

-Mission driven colleagues -Beautiful office across the street from Echo Park Lake -Learning opportunities for state and local policy work -External equity lens -PTO -Structured and organized -Opportunities to work with amazing grassroots organizations and a wide array of other partners

Kontras

-No HR department so there are so many instances of harassment that get swept under the rug. -Failure to complete an insane amount of work is blamed on “time management” issues -Especially during the pandemic, not accommodating to parents. -No growth opportunities; they created additional “tiers” for management including “senior manager,” meanwhile their front facing staff don’t have access to promotions into management. --Some promotions do happen but only for those who don’t question nor have any negative feedback about the org or their leaders, even if it’s factual, objective feedback. -Low wages (comparable to other similar orgs), except for management. -Inequitable distribution of projects and opportunities. - Prefer to hire Ivy Leaguers and those with law degrees fresh out of school with little/no experience over people with actual community and/or policy experience. -In dire need of a union to represent employees. The DC office has it but they’ll never allow the LA office to do the same. -MASSIVE turnover. -No exit interviews. -Will not hesitate to exercise at will and fire for no reason. -They would rather hire not as competent outsiders than promote their highly qualified staff. That happened to a few of their people this year.

4
Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle