poor people management & culture - Consultant bei Adecco: Mitarbeiterbewertung

1.0
22. Aug. 2024
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

couldn’t find any reason to join

Kontras

Turnover rate is high! not recommend joining the perm team. There is “A” managerial level people who is married but frequently harasses female colleagues, deceives subordinates regarding billing. Additionally, there is another managerial level people who always yelling in the office which is so annoying. The benefits that the company offers are not fully accessible under perm team, for example: wfh, special time off, regular lunch time hour The Company displeased when employees leave work on time or work from home. The distribution of job responsibilities within the company also appears to be uneven. Most concerningly, the overall compensation levels at Adecco are quite low, which is disappointing given the demanding work culture.

Mehr Bewertungen zu Adecco entdecken

5.0
7. März 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

It's a good place to work.

Kontras

Not the best experience or secure work

1.0
27. März 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Onboarding for new hires was smooth

Kontras

My experience with Adecco Staffing Agency reflects a significant disconnect between the expectations set during onboarding and the reality of assignment execution. There appears to be a consistent misalignment between candidate skill sets and the roles they are placed into, which not only undermines performance but also creates unnecessary inefficiencies for both the employee and the client organization. Assignments are often presented without full transparency regarding scope, schedule, or operational requirements, resulting in frequent adjustments that disrupt workflow continuity and personal planning. Additionally, there is a notable deficiency in accurate and timely reporting. Communication regarding assignment details, schedule changes, and performance expectations lacks consistency and clarity. This creates ambiguity in accountability and limits the employee’s ability to effectively manage deliverables. From a process standpoint, this reflects weak coordination and insufficient control mechanisms within their staffing and reporting systems. Most concerning is the apparent lack of advocacy for the employee. A staffing agency should function as an intermediary that ensures alignment between employer needs and employee capabilities while also safeguarding fair treatment and clear communication. In this case, there is a perception that employee concerns—particularly those related to schedule changes, workload expectations, and workplace conditions—are not adequately addressed or escalated. This ultimately results in a work environment that feels transactional rather than supportive, with limited consideration for employee well-being or long-term success.

Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle