Adecco (Silicon Valley) - Client Program Manager bei Adecco: Mitarbeiterbewertung

4.0
3. Aug. 2015
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Benefits- medical and dental is fairly competitive, they match up to 3% of the 401k plan, and 18 days PTO Management- This can vary a lot by team and region but I've been here 3 years and in two different roles and all my managers have been fantastic. They seem to genuinely care about their teams and work hard to promote internally whenever possible. Work/Life balance- Again, this probably varies quite a bit by region and branch. However, I work in Silicon Valley where work /life balance in most companies is non-existent and in my experience this is something Adecco does well. When employees have personal situations that require flexibility (small children, sick family members, long commutes, etc) they have worked hard to accommodate them.

Kontras

Salary- Pay is below market and it's caused some of their best employees to leave. This puts a strain on current employees who are then left with added responsibility while new hires are trained. It also makes it hard for Adecco to recruit experienced employees, so a lot of the employees are the branch level are brand new to staffing.

Mehr Bewertungen zu Adecco entdecken

5.0
7. März 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

It's a good place to work.

Kontras

Not the best experience or secure work

1.0
27. März 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Onboarding for new hires was smooth

Kontras

My experience with Adecco Staffing Agency reflects a significant disconnect between the expectations set during onboarding and the reality of assignment execution. There appears to be a consistent misalignment between candidate skill sets and the roles they are placed into, which not only undermines performance but also creates unnecessary inefficiencies for both the employee and the client organization. Assignments are often presented without full transparency regarding scope, schedule, or operational requirements, resulting in frequent adjustments that disrupt workflow continuity and personal planning. Additionally, there is a notable deficiency in accurate and timely reporting. Communication regarding assignment details, schedule changes, and performance expectations lacks consistency and clarity. This creates ambiguity in accountability and limits the employee’s ability to effectively manage deliverables. From a process standpoint, this reflects weak coordination and insufficient control mechanisms within their staffing and reporting systems. Most concerning is the apparent lack of advocacy for the employee. A staffing agency should function as an intermediary that ensures alignment between employer needs and employee capabilities while also safeguarding fair treatment and clear communication. In this case, there is a perception that employee concerns—particularly those related to schedule changes, workload expectations, and workplace conditions—are not adequately addressed or escalated. This ultimately results in a work environment that feels transactional rather than supportive, with limited consideration for employee well-being or long-term success.

Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle