Experience varies widely depending on location. - Data Entry/Clerical bei Adecco: Mitarbeiterbewertung

3.0
15. Juni 2009
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Variety of *entry*level* jobs, great for jacks-of-all-trades. Great for students, fill-in jobs, seasonal employment, summer work, etc. Good connections to local job community; often many opportunities (not always).

Kontras

--Several different positions are usually available, but many people vying for them. Often overly-qualified applicants (such as myself, with nearly 100% on all tests) with lower experience in available fields are left doing $8/hour foodservice fill-in jobs with no explanation. --Have to sometimes pry 'minimum rate' advice from associates (balance skills/experience with minimum requested income rate to enhance prospects) -- I've been badly advised on more than one occasion, and been passed over for perfectly acceptable jobs that were very close to but under my minimum.

Mehr Bewertungen zu Adecco entdecken

5.0
4. Mai 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

The team was great to work with

Kontras

Could have used an additional recruiter for the time I was there to free up the store manager to meet with more clients

1.0
27. März 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Onboarding for new hires was smooth

Kontras

My experience with Adecco Staffing Agency reflects a significant disconnect between the expectations set during onboarding and the reality of assignment execution. There appears to be a consistent misalignment between candidate skill sets and the roles they are placed into, which not only undermines performance but also creates unnecessary inefficiencies for both the employee and the client organization. Assignments are often presented without full transparency regarding scope, schedule, or operational requirements, resulting in frequent adjustments that disrupt workflow continuity and personal planning. Additionally, there is a notable deficiency in accurate and timely reporting. Communication regarding assignment details, schedule changes, and performance expectations lacks consistency and clarity. This creates ambiguity in accountability and limits the employee’s ability to effectively manage deliverables. From a process standpoint, this reflects weak coordination and insufficient control mechanisms within their staffing and reporting systems. Most concerning is the apparent lack of advocacy for the employee. A staffing agency should function as an intermediary that ensures alignment between employer needs and employee capabilities while also safeguarding fair treatment and clear communication. In this case, there is a perception that employee concerns—particularly those related to schedule changes, workload expectations, and workplace conditions—are not adequately addressed or escalated. This ultimately results in a work environment that feels transactional rather than supportive, with limited consideration for employee well-being or long-term success.

Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle