Racist, unprofessional and rude to name a few - Recruiter bei Adecco: Mitarbeiterbewertung

1.0
23. Jan. 2017
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Absolutely none. Glassdoor says I need 5 words, I can't come up with one positive adjective

Kontras

I worked as a recruiter for a few recruitment agencies but Adecco has to be the most unprofessional of them all. Some of the incidents I witnessed could easily end up in convictions. There is utter chaos in the structure and absolutely no professionalism. I worked with not more than 10 people during that time and I saw police interventions, racial abuse and the lowest form of human behaviour. I don't even know how this company is still allowed to operate legally and how they get away with what the recruiters do to people.

avatar
Reaktion von Adecco
9y
I am extremely sorry that you feel like this and am also very surprised to hear this. I am the Manager of the Adecco Manchester branch and I have not had a resourcer leave within the last 3 years so I am assuming that you have worked on a project for Adecco potentially in the Manchester area. I would really like the opportunity to discuss this with you, and if I can help and assist you find a job please contact me. Kind Regards, Angela Aimson angela.aimson@adecco.co.uk 0161 233 8100

Mehr Bewertungen zu Adecco entdecken

5.0
4. Mai 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

The team was great to work with

Kontras

Could have used an additional recruiter for the time I was there to free up the store manager to meet with more clients

1.0
27. März 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Onboarding for new hires was smooth

Kontras

My experience with Adecco Staffing Agency reflects a significant disconnect between the expectations set during onboarding and the reality of assignment execution. There appears to be a consistent misalignment between candidate skill sets and the roles they are placed into, which not only undermines performance but also creates unnecessary inefficiencies for both the employee and the client organization. Assignments are often presented without full transparency regarding scope, schedule, or operational requirements, resulting in frequent adjustments that disrupt workflow continuity and personal planning. Additionally, there is a notable deficiency in accurate and timely reporting. Communication regarding assignment details, schedule changes, and performance expectations lacks consistency and clarity. This creates ambiguity in accountability and limits the employee’s ability to effectively manage deliverables. From a process standpoint, this reflects weak coordination and insufficient control mechanisms within their staffing and reporting systems. Most concerning is the apparent lack of advocacy for the employee. A staffing agency should function as an intermediary that ensures alignment between employer needs and employee capabilities while also safeguarding fair treatment and clear communication. In this case, there is a perception that employee concerns—particularly those related to schedule changes, workload expectations, and workplace conditions—are not adequately addressed or escalated. This ultimately results in a work environment that feels transactional rather than supportive, with limited consideration for employee well-being or long-term success.

Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle