Childish clique-ish management - Mitarbeiter (anonym) bei AMS: Mitarbeiterbewertung

1.0
17. Sept. 2015
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

- some decent client names - okay contractor rates

Kontras

- Immature management incapable of allowing grown-ups to take own decisions, highly political - if you challenge anything at any level, it is met with contempt and derision - Everything is KPI led and driven - no room for judgment, typically these are totally unrealistic and bear no resemblance to the role - Very little support - sink or swim environment - No social glue to keep people together, even permanent employees did not know where the HQ was! - Everything is a battle - getting expenses paid, given sub-standard tools to do job i.e. phone/laptop

avatar
Reaktion von AMS
10y
I was really concerned to read your review as this is not the experience we want anyone to have in our company. I would be really keen to discuss this with you. Please contact me in confidence at sheena.cartwright@alexmann.com

Mehr Bewertungen zu AMS entdecken

5.0
19. Feb. 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

AMS has great culture, they care about the people who work at the company.

Kontras

Client relationships can be difficult

avatar
Reaktion von AMS
3mo
Thank you for sharing your experience. It’s great to hear our culture and the care we show for our people have made a positive impact. That sense of support and connection across teams is something we work hard to nurture every day. We also recognize that client relationships can be complex at times. Supporting our teams to navigate those environments with confidence and collaboration remains an important focus for us. We appreciate your feedback and your contribution to AMS.
1.0
27. Apr. 2026
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Flexible and remote working Great company but with the right leadership

Kontras

Since the leadership change last year, the culture within AMS has deteriorated significantly. The new CDTO’s approach has created an environment that feels increasingly toxic and unsustainable for many employees. There is a strong sense that every problem is expected to be solved—or sidelined—by AI, often without realistic planning, sufficient resources, or input from the teams actually responsible for execution. This has led to confusion, constant shifting priorities, and a lack of meaningful support for getting work done effectively. At the same time, workloads have increased to an unsustainable level. Expectations continue to rise, but without additional resources or clear prioritization. Many teams are stretched thin, juggling multiple high-pressure initiatives with tight deadlines, which only adds to the stress and makes it difficult to maintain quality or balance. More concerning is the leadership style. Communication often feels driven by pressure and fear rather than clarity or collaboration. Many employees feel they are operating under constant scrutiny, which has contributed to widespread stress, anxiety, and low morale across the department. It’s becoming common to hear colleagues express reluctance to come into work, not because of the workload itself, but because of the atmosphere.

6
Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle