Total lack of integrity - Mitarbeiter (anonym) bei Raffles Education Corp: Mitarbeiterbewertung

1.0
23. März 2016
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

The students do great work, and some of the new staff are very devoted and passionate about their work. There is lots of space in the Sydney building and the location is handy, although out of town. Fashion Marketing, and Digital Media are excellent courses.

Kontras

The huge potential is lost with the lack of clear governance, policy, ethics, integrity, and separation of academic control from financial dependence. The owners are too involved with the academic issues and disrupt the clear process of leadership from those charged by the government to lead the college. Lack of standards in the past had brought the college down, and will continue to cast a dark shadow making it hard for some of the devoted staff and administrators from achieving genuine results. An owner supported leadership is the cause of serious problems that they will now face that in the end impacts on the education of the students. Beyond governance, policy and owners interference in academic issues, the course structure needs review and updating to move away from the craft system and more towards a 21st C model of design thinking. In general, this is a terrible place to work but there are very good people there trying hard in a system that is flawed.

Mehr Bewertungen zu Raffles Education Corp entdecken

5.0
4. Feb. 2016
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Fun exciting growth opportunity hard work

Kontras

Un-organised, long hours, poor working conditions

2
1.0
28. Juni 2015
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

u decide how to manage your work and timelime to finish, will reward abit if make a difference to the company

Kontras

weak in HR policies (14 AL+MC, IHP below $35 cap), sudden implement of aws with claw back clause, leave is based on monthly earned, dun trust HR for any bonus, high turnover, some dept not helpful to share info, those recruited r not as experience w no communication skill, end up last min work n keep push blame n point finger that its not ur duty. Duty not define clear, end up do other dept job cos they r not experience.micromanagers r common, some dept doing dinosaur age work, compulsory watapp msgs go beyond work week/hours, info flying everywhere n hard to gather.

13
Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle