Good but no longer great. - Supervisor bei PayPal: Mitarbeiterbewertung

2.0
11. März 2009
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

The benefits for insurance are well priced. They were very liberal with stock options when I first started with the company which has since been reduced. They are active in the community and host many events.

Kontras

People are not compensated fairly for the amount of work put in. Stock options are great but when the stock is not doing well they are completely worthless so annual increases would be a better solution. The senior management is very poor at making decisions and sticking to them. There is very little investment in the workforce and most of the money is going to Marketplaces which is even more poorly run than PayPal.

Mehr Bewertungen zu PayPal entdecken

5.0
18. Apr. 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Great company! My managers and directors care about who I am as a person. They want you to succeed and be efficient at the role so you have the tools and support to foster that growth.

Kontras

Big company energy. Can be draining month after month. Sales as a whole can be tiring but it’s very rewarding when you get lucky, put in the hard work and hustle!

2.0
13. Apr. 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

PayPal has a lot of potential. It has two very strong brands in PayPal and Venmo with significant awareness and user bases that other companies envy. There are pockets of teams that are really pushing the envelop to reimagine what PayPal and Venmo could be—especially the Venmo team—and to move with speed given the company must stay focused and not waste time with Apple Pay, Shop Pay, and so many other competitors nipping at PayPal's heels and aggressively taking market share.

Kontras

While some teams are pushing to self-disrupt and are moving fast, too many teams—and I'd argue the majority of the company–are living off of PayPal's laurels from the late 2010s through the pandemic. The culture and mindset have to change for the company to remain competitive. Otherwise, they are the Titanic and they're sinking slowly. The former CEO who only last 2 years tried diversifying the company's revenue, planning for the future. But the board and its former chairman (now new CEO) felt he wasn't moving fast enough to stabilize and marketshare. Instead, the board hired the former chairman who made computers and printers at HP—another sinking ship—to lead the oldest fintech company. The loss of confidence in the leadership team and the strategy are only accelerating.

1
Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle