Not meeting current challenges in management - Scientist bei Merck: Mitarbeiterbewertung

4.0
12. Dez. 2013
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Working environment is generally enjoyable. The scientists are dedicated, hardworking and easy to work with in a good team structure. Mid-level management is giving it there all.

Kontras

Management is all over the board. There is no plan. The higher ups throw word salad at middle management and expect them to hit a moving target. They infrastructure was already taxed and the staffing is now down to a shoestring. The current scientific format will not bear fruit.

Mehr Bewertungen zu Merck entdecken

5.0
3. Juni 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

End of the year shutdown which includes paid time off

Kontras

The con for me at the time was that I had to relocate which wasn’t possible

4.0
2. Juni 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Over my tenure, I had the opportunity to work alongside highly talented and mission-driven colleagues dedicated to improving patient outcomes. The organization provided exposure to cross-functional collaboration, leadership development opportunities, and meaningful work supporting healthcare providers, patients, and community stakeholders. I appreciated the company's commitment to innovation, professional growth, and serving patients through scientific advancement.

Kontras

Like many large organizations, priorities and organizational structures evolved over time, which occasionally created uncertainty and changes in responsibilities. Decision-making processes could sometimes be complex due to the size of the organization, and navigating multiple layers of stakeholders occasionally impacted speed and execution.

Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle