Glad I left of my own free will - Mitarbeiter (anonym) bei Dow: Mitarbeiterbewertung

3.0
4. Jan. 2017
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Was once a world leader in invention and manufacturing. It was a great science and engineering company. Now merging with DuPont since neither could invent anything, the MBA's won. Awesome training and work experiences that are helping me excel at my new, much higher paying employer.

Kontras

Perpetually short on cash. You know how poor people say they didn't know they were poor? Dow's like that... Has been in a panic since the recession. Tried too hard to diversify and failed miserably. Should have stuck to what it was great at Has been the shrinking chemical company for more than a decade through asset sales and demoralizing layoffs

Mehr Bewertungen zu Dow entdecken

5.0
1. Apr. 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Good career growth opportunities, great work/life balance, great benefits

Kontras

Pay is ok but not great.

2.0
22. März 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Safety culture, flexibility (although less and less over time). Good health insurance and 401k match

Kontras

Dow’s recent years illustrate the challenges of trying to simultaneously satisfy Wall Street’s demands for strong financial performance and aggressive DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) priorities. The company has heavily emphasized inclusion initiatives, including its openly gay CEO publicly sharing that coming out was one of the best days of his life in an internal communication, along with a notable increase in women appointed to senior leadership roles. Hiring practices reportedly require diverse candidate slates—including female candidates—and diverse interview panels before filling positions. These efforts, while well-intentioned, appear to have contributed to a series of questionable strategic decisions. Employees have borne the brunt through repeated rounds of layoffs (including significant cuts announced in recent years), minimal merit increases often in the 2-3% range, stalled promotions, and little turnover at the top levels of leadership. Senior executives seem insulated from the consequences, potentially overlooking how these factors—including their own leadership—may be central to the company’s ongoing struggles.

2
Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle